Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576064›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2025

Managing medicines in decentralization: discrepancies between national policies and local practices in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia.

Relmbuss Biljers Fanda, Ari Probandari, Maarten Olivier Kok, Roland A Bal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Relmbuss Biljers FandaCenter for Health Policy and Management, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Medika, Sendowo, Sinduadi, Mlati, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-4457
Ari ProbandariDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta, Central Java, 57126, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3171-5271
Maarten Olivier KokHealthcare Governance Department, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, South Holand, 3062 PA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8957-1253
Roland A BalHealthcare Governance Department, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, South Holand, 3062 PA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7202-5053

Funding

Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan S-191/LPDP.4/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Indonesia, primary health centres (PHCs) are mandated to provide essential medicines to ensure equal access to medication for all Indonesians, as stated in the national medicine policy. However, limited information is available regarding the actual practices of health workers within the context of decentralized governance. This paper investigates the discrepancies between national policies and local practices in two Indonesian districts, shedding light on coping mechanisms employed in each phase of medicine management within PHCs. The mixed-method study began by identifying pertinent policies addressing medicine management in PHCs. Subsequently, panel data on patient visits to tuberculosis, maternal and neonatal health (MNH), and noncommunicable disease (NCD) services were collected from 2019 to 2022. After analysing the panel data, interviews were conducted with 56 health workers including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, midwives, and public health programme managers regarding their views on fluctuations in medicine stocks and the patient visit data. These participants included pharmacists and programme managers specializing in tuberculosis, MNH, and NCD care and were affiliated with PHCs and district health offices. Our findings highlight the occasional unavailability of essential medicines in PHCs, with stockouts being attributed to supplier shortages at provincial and national levels and to variations in the capacity of the local health system. Low-skilled pharmaceutical staff are a contributing factor in each phase of medicine management. Additionally, health workers employ coping mechanisms, such as deviating from policy on the use of capitation funds to purchase medicines, to manage temporary stockouts. To tackle systemic stockouts, central government should prioritize capacity-building among health workers, by establishing a continuous and easily accessible local learning system.

Indexed as

Drugs, EssentialHealth PolicyPoliticsPrimary Health CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIndonesiaTuberculosisDrugs, Essentialaccess to medicinedecentralizationlocal systemmanaging medicinesprimary health centre

Identifiers

PMID39576064
PMCPMC11886838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.