ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025
Moving beyond tokenism: Sustaining engagement of persons living with dementia in identifying emergency research priorities.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Involving People With Dementia in Research: Contributions, Barriers and Evaluation From a Meta-Synthesis and Qualitative Interview Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- What Matters Most to People Living With Dementia and Their Care Partners During Emergency Department Visits.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Standardization Study (GEARSS): An Observational Study of Older Emergency Department Patients.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Observational
- Engaging Community Reviewers: The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (2.0)-Advancing Dementia Care Network Approach.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network 2.0-Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0-ADC) aims to advance research efforts to improve the emergency care of persons living with dementia (PLWDs).
objectiveTo support this objective, GEAR 2.0-ADC convened a virtual consensus conference to prioritize emergency care research opportunities for PLWDs inclusive of perspectives of PLWDs to ensure identification of research gaps in response to their experiences and priorities. Inclusion of PLWDs as research partners is increasingly recognized as a best practice, however, approaches to facilitating consensus participation are lacking.
methodsBest practices for supporting the engagement of PLWDs in a consensus conference, applied across its three phases (pre-conference, during the conference, and post-conference), include: establishing a learning environment focused on research priorities before the event, presenting information in ways that align with participants' learning preferences while accommodating cognitive impairments, and providing multiple opportunities and methods for gathering post-conference feedback from PLWDs.
resultsThese strategies were identified by PLWDs and care partners (CPs) through semi-structured interviews, who were involved in the convening process, aimed at exploring ways to enhance facilitation techniques for participants.
conclusionAdditionally, these summarized insights aim to encourage the use of community-engaged approaches in discussions and consensus-building around research priorities in emergency care, particularly for PLWDs and their CPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.