ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Exploration of the potential impact of batch-to-batch variability on the establishment of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence for inhalation powder drug products.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploration of the potential impact of batch-to-batch variability on the establishment of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence for inhalation powder drug products.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Batch-to-batch variability in inhalation powder has been identified as a potential challenge in the development of generic versions. This study explored the impact of batch-to-batch variability on the probability of establishing pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) in a two-sequence, two-period (2 × 2) crossover study. A model-based parametric simulation approach was employed, incorporating batch-to-batch variability through the relative bioavailability (RBA) ratio. In the absence of batch variability, recruiting a total of 48 subjects in a 2 × 2 crossover study with the reference formulation resulted in a 95% probability of concluding BE. However, this probability decreased to 80% with a 5% batch difference in RBA and further declined to 30% with a 10% batch difference. With a 10% batch difference, the required number of subjects to achieve an 80% probability of concluding BE increased to 84. When considering product differences between the reference and the test formulations, an additional 10% batch difference reduced the study power from 97% to 30% for a T/R bioavailability ratio of 100% in a 2 × 2 crossover study with 48 subjects. As a result, the substantial impact of batch-to-batch variability on the study power and type I error of the PK BE study may pose significant challenges for the development of generic Advair Diskus due to its degree of PK batch-to-batch variability. Therefore, alternative PK BE study designs and guidelines are needed to adequately address the influence of batch-to-batch variability in products like Advair Diskus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.