ArticleClinical and translational science2024
What motivates people with type 2 diabetes mellitus to participate in clinical trials from home?
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Running a clinical trial remotely: Lessons learnt from a decentralised multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital health intervention for Chronic Kidney Disease.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Why and how do we perform physical examination(s) in clinical trials? A use case of drug intervention trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Do people prefer to take part in a clinical trial from home or come to site? A discrete choice experiment in type 2 diabetes mellitus.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Bringing Trial Activities to Participants-The Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial Investigating Decentralization of Trials.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- What motivates people with type 2 diabetes mellitus to participate in clinical trials from home?Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Digital tools and self-administered home blood tests: A convergent mixed methods pilot study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), in which all or part of the trial activities are moved to the participants' immediate surroundings, promise to improve trial conduct. However, no evidence is available on what motivates people to participate in DCTs. Our aim was to determine the drivers and perceptions for participation in clinical trials with different decentralization levels in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Five focus groups were conducted utilizing the nominal group technique in the Netherlands (n = 1), Germany (n = 1), and Austria (n = 3) with four to six participants per group. The focus groups were analyzed using thematic analysis. Of the 26 participants (10 females, median age: 66 years [IQR: 62-72]) 42% had previously participated in a trial, and almost all had internet access at home (96%). A total of seven main themes regarding participation in clinical trials (location, time investment, contact with healthcare professionals (HCPs), digital technologies, data collection, perceived risk, and motivation) were identified, of which a total of 20 drivers emerged. Perceptions regarding trial participation differed widely among participants, and individual preferences influenced which drivers were considered more important by participants. Flexibility of location and time spent on the trial were identified as the most motivating factors for participation in DCTs. Some drivers, such as digital infrastructure, digital literacy, home visits, personal interaction, and relationship with HCPs were perceived as both enablers and barriers, depending on personal preferences. However, most of the potential barriers regarding DCTs may be resolved by addressing them in the design of future DCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.