ArticleProteins2025
Impact of Alignments on the Accuracy of Protein Subcellular Localization Predictions.
Article in Proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing SCL2205: a protein sequence-based spatial modelling dataset for the protein language model frontier.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- ProteinFormer: protein subcellular localization based on bioimages and modified pre-trained transformer.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Designing Multifunctional Microneedles in Biomedical Engineering: Materials, Methods, and Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alignments in bioinformatics refer to the arrangement of sequences to identify regions of similarity that can indicate functional, structural, or evolutionary relationships. They are crucial for bioinformaticians as they enable accurate predictions and analyses in various applications, including protein subcellular localization. The predictive model used in this article is based on a deep - convolutional architecture. We tested configurations of Deep N-to-1 convolutional neural networks of various depths and widths during experimentation for the evaluation of better-performing values across a diverse set of eight classes. For without alignment assessment, sequences are encoded using one-hot encoding, converting each character into a numerical representation, which is straightforward for non-numerical data and useful for machine learning models. For with alignments assessment, multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) are created using PSI-BLAST, capturing evolutionary information by calculating frequencies of residues and gaps. The average difference in peak performance between models with alignments and without alignments is approximately 15.82%. The average difference in the highest accuracy achieved with alignments compared with without alignments is approximately 15.16%. Thus, extensive experimentation indicates that higher alignment accuracy implies a more reliable model and improved prediction accuracy, which can be trusted to deliver consistent performance across different layers and classes of subcellular localization predictions. This research provides valuable insights into prediction accuracies with and without alignments, offering bioinformaticians an effective tool for better understanding while potentially reducing the need for extensive experimental validations. The source code and datasets are available at http://distilldeep.ucd.ie/SCL8/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.