ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2024
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in a patient with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dupilumab for the Treatment of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Systematic Review.International journal of dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Prescribing Biologic Immune-Modifying Therapies for Patients with a History of Cancer: A Cross-Specialty Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Targeted Therapies and Pharmacologic Advances in Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: A Comprehensive Review.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, in a patient with atopic dermatitis (AD) and a history of metastatic renal cancer. Over 20 months of follow-up, the patient experienced significant improvement in AD symptoms without any recurrence of cancer. In addition to not stimulating carcinogenesis, dupilumab might synergistically inhibit tumor-induced immunosuppression, thereby potentially preventing tumor progression. This case suggests that dupilumab could be a viable treatment option for patients with AD and a history of solid neoplasms, filling a critical gap in current therapeutic approaches. Current evidence indicates that dupilumab does not promote cancer progression, but further research is necessary to confirm its long-term safety in this population. To establish robust scientific evidence and develop precise clinical guidelines, future studies should be randomized, controlled, and large-scale. This will help provide a definitive understanding of the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with a history of cancer and inform clinical practice. In summary, although the initial findings are promising, comprehensive research is essential to ensure the optimal management of AD in patients with a history of malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.