Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575509›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2024

Beyond genomic studies of congenital heart defects through systematic modelling and phenotyping.

Deborah J Henderson, Ahlam Alqahtani, Bill Chaudhry, Andrew Cook, Lorraine Eley, Lucile Houyel, Marina Hughes, Bernard Keavney, José Luis de la Pompa, John Sled and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. EchoVisuALL: From Echocardiography to Gene Discovery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Modelling Tetralogy of Fallot: insights and limitations of animal models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. The power of mouse models in the diagnostic odyssey of patients with rare congenital anomalies.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Deborah J HendersonMRC National Mouse Genetics Network, Congenital Anomalies Cluster, Harwell, OX11 0RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2705-5998
Ahlam AlqahtaniBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1145-8474
Bill ChaudhryBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2833-8882
Andrew CookUniversity College London, Zayed Centre for Research, London WC1N 1DZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5079-7546
Lorraine EleyBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK.
Lucile HouyelCongenital and Pediatric Cardiology Unit, M3C-Necker, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, Université Paris Cité, 149 Rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4024-8599
Marina HughesCardiology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3052-8351
Bernard KeavneyDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9573-0812
José Luis de la PompaIntercellular Signaling in Cardiovascular Development and Disease Laboratory, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6761-7265
John SledMouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto M5G 1XS, Canada. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G 1XS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-283X
Nadine SpielmannInstitute of Experimental Genetics, German Mouse Clinic, Helmholtz Center Munich (GmbH), German Research Center for Environmental Health, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2699-0068
Lydia TeboulMary Lyon Centre, MRC Harwell, Oxfordshire OX11 0RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2789-8637
Stephane ZaffranAix Marseille Université, INSERM, Marseille Medical Genetics, U1251, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0811-418X
Pleasantine MillMRC National Mouse Genetics Network, Congenital Anomalies Cluster, Harwell, OX11 0RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-134X
Karen J LiuMRC National Mouse Genetics Network, Congenital Anomalies Cluster, Harwell, OX11 0RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2483-2165

Funding

Additional VenturesAFM-TelethonAgence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE13-0047-02Agencia Estatal de InvestigaciónBritish Heart Foundation CH/13/2/30154CIHR PJT169050European Regional Development FundEuropean Research Council 866355Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleInstituto de Salud Carlos IIILa Caixa Research Health Foundation LCF/PR/HR23/5243001Medical Research Council mc_up_2201/1Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades CEX2020-0001041-SMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2022-136942OB-100Pro-CNIC Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital heart defects (CHDs), the most common congenital anomalies, are considered to have a significant genetic component. However, despite considerable efforts to identify pathogenic genes in patients with CHDs, few gene variants have been proven as causal. The complexity of the genetic architecture underlying human CHDs likely contributes to this poor genetic discovery rate. However, several other factors are likely to contribute. For example, the level of patient phenotyping required for clinical care may be insufficient for research studies focused on mechanistic discovery. Although several hundred mouse gene knockouts have been described with CHDs, these are generally not phenotyped and described in the same way as CHDs in patients, and thus are not readily comparable. Moreover, most patients with CHDs carry variants of uncertain significance of crucial cardiac genes, further complicating comparisons between humans and mouse mutants. In spite of major advances in cardiac developmental biology over the past 25 years, these advances have not been well communicated to geneticists and cardiologists. As a consequence, the latest data from developmental biology are not always used in the design and interpretation of studies aimed at discovering the genetic causes of CHDs. In this Special Article, while considering other in vitro and in vivo models, we create a coherent framework for accurately modelling and phenotyping human CHDs in mice, thereby enhancing the translation of genetic and genomic studies into the causes of CHDs in patients.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalGenomicsHeart Defects, CongenitalPhenotypeAnimalsHumansMiceModels, BiologicalCardiac phenotypingCongenital heart defectDevelopmental biologyDisease modellingGeneticsGene variantGenomicsHuman patientMouse modelStructural anomalies

Identifiers

PMID39575509
PMCPMC11603121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.