Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575503›Full record

SynthesisHealth policy and planning2025

What is the relationship between hospital management practices and quality of care? A systematic review of the global evidence.

Charlotte Ward, Elias Rejoice Maynard Phiri, Catherine Goodman, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Monica Malata, Wanangwa Chimwaza Manda, Victor Mwapasa, Timothy Powell-Jackson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte WardDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4223-7850
Elias Rejoice Maynard PhiriHealth Systems Department, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Catherine GoodmanDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2241-3485
Alinane Linda Nyondo-MipandoHealth Systems Department, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Monica MalataHealth Systems Department, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Wanangwa Chimwaza MandaHealth Systems Department, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Victor MwapasaHealth Systems Department, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Timothy Powell-JacksonDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.

Funding

National Institute for Health NIHR131237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a widely held view that good management improves organizational performance. However, hospitals are complex organizations, and the relationship between management practices and health service delivery is not straightforward. We conducted a global, systematic literature review of the quantitative evidence on the link between the adoption of management practices and quality of care in hospitals. We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, EconLit, Global Health, and Web of Science on 16 October 2024, without language or country restrictions. We included empirical studies from 1 January 2000 onwards, examining the quantitative association between hospital management practices and quality of care. Outcomes included structural quality (availability of resources such as drugs and equipment), clinical quality (adherence to guidelines), health outcomes, and patient satisfaction or experience with care. In every study, each tested association was categorized as significantly positive (at the 5% level), null, or significantly negative. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022301462). Of 11 731 articles, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria and had an acceptable risk of bias. Studies were equally distributed between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, with 22 cross-sectional and three intervention studies. Of 111 associations, 55 (49.5%) were significantly positive, one (1%) was significantly negative, and 55 (49.5%) were null. Among the associations tested, the majority were significantly positive for structural quality (79%), clinical quality (60%), and health outcomes (57%), while most associations between hospital management and patient satisfaction (80%) were null. The findings are mixed, with a similar proportion of positive and null associations between management practices and quality of care across studies. The evidence is limited by the risk of bias introduced by nonrandomized study designs. Evidence of positive associations in some settings warrants further investigation of the association through intervention studies or natural experiments. This could leverage methodological developments in quantitatively measuring management, highlighted by this review.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationQuality of Health CareGlobal HealthHospitalsHumansPatient Satisfactionhealth systemsmanagement practicesquality of caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39575503
PMCPMC11886796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.