Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575453›Full record

ArticleScientifica2024

Key Proteins for Regeneration in

Aylin Del Moral-Morales, Cynthia Sámano, José Antonio Ocampo-Cervantes, Maya Topf, Jan Baumbach, Jossephlyn Hernández, Karla Torres-Arciga, Rodrigo González-Barrios, Ernesto Soto-Reyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientifica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aylin Del Moral-MoralesDepartamento de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa (UAM-C), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-628X
Cynthia SámanoDepartamento de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa (UAM-C), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8909-9582
José Antonio Ocampo-CervantesCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas y Acuícolas de Cuemanco (CIBAC), Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco (UAM-X), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-5832
Maya TopfCentre for Structural Systems Biology (CSSB), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-1215
Jan BaumbachInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-0462
Jossephlyn HernándezDepartamento de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa (UAM-C), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-5945
Karla Torres-ArcigaUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4658-5310
Rodrigo González-BarriosUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8982-6586
Ernesto Soto-ReyesDepartamento de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa (UAM-C), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-6406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The axolotl, known for its remarkable regenerative abilities, is an excellent model for studying regenerative therapies. Nevertheless, the precise molecular mechanisms governing its regenerative potential remain uncertain. In this study, we collected samples from axolotls of different ages, including 8-year-old individuals and 8-month-old juveniles, obtaining their blastemas 10 days after amputation. Subsequently, we conducted a transcriptomic analysis comparing our samples to a set of previously published experiments. Our analysis unveiled a distinctive transcriptional response in the blastema, characterized by differential gene expression associated with processes such as bone and tissue remodeling, transcriptional regulation, angiogenesis, and intercellular communication. To gain deeper insights, we compared these findings with those from aged axolotls that showed no signs of regeneration 10 days after amputation. We identified four genes-

Indexed as

agingAmbystoma mexicanumblastematissue regenerationtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39575453
PMCPMC11581807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.