SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
Efficacy and safety of Toliparibumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping metabolic reprogramming dynamics across pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cell differentiation at single-cell transcriptomic resolution.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Red cell distribution width: a novel and accessible predictor for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis-a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Ivonescimab monotherapy in an elderly patient with EGFR-TKI-resistant advanced lung adenocarcinoma and pericardial effusion: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Vitamin D and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: A Synergistic Approach to Enhancing Treatment Efficacy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This research intends to investigate the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using Toripalimab, focusing on its effectiveness and safety profile. Efficacy refers to the survival prognosis, while safety pertains to the occurrence of adverse events in our study. It also aims to provide reference information for neoadjuvant and postoperative therapies. Methods: Up to March 20, 2024, studies on randomized controlled trials and single-arm trials involving Toripalimab for NSCLC were sourced from the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. Data extraction and analysis were independently conducted by two researchers utilizing Stata 15.0 and R software. Results: A total of 8 studies were analyzed, including 6 single-arm studies and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Toripalimab treatment in the RCTs showed an overall survival (OS) of [HR=0.67, 95% CI (0.53, 0.85); p=0.71]. The objective response rate (ORR) from single-arm studies was reported as [ES=0.59, 95% CI (0.36, 0.81); p<0.01], and progression-free survival (PFS) was [ES=4.89, 95% CI (2.65, 9.02); p<0.01]. Furthermore, observed adverse effects included Anemia [OR=0.53, 95% CI (0.26, 0.79); p<0.01], Neutropenia [OR=0.43, 95% CI (0.20, 0.68); p<0.01], and Thrombocytopenia [OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.18, 0.43); p<0.01]. Conclusions: Toripalimab, being China's first domestically developed anti-tumor PD-1 antibody drug, shows potential advantages over traditional chemotherapy in possibly prolonging patients' survival times. However, the limited number of studies included indicates the need for additional single-arm and RCT studies to further validate these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier (CRD42024519806).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.