ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2024
Lenvatinib, sintilimab combined interventional treatment
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy of lenvatinib combined with sintilimab and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Sequential ICI plus Anti-VEGF/TKI with On-Demand TACE beyond RECIST Progression Improves Pathological Response, Resectability, and Survival in Unresectable HCC.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Comparing of Efficacy and Safety Between Sintilimab Plus IBI305 and PD-1 Inhibitor Plus TKIs in Combination of TACE for uHCC.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Lenvatinib versus Bevacizumab in Triple Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Interventional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macrovascular Invasion: A Multi-Center Real-World Retrospective Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Successful conversion therapy for presumed granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-producing hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Effects of Lenvatinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors on efficacy, immune function and prognosis in patients with primary liver cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Immune therapies in intermediate-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Changing the therapeutic landscape.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Treatment of intermediate-to-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is shifting toward a multidisciplinary strategy that includes multiple modalities as needed.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Two treatment methods for hepatocellular carcinoma: Lenvatinib or bevacizumab combined with sintilimab and interventional therapy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBevacizumab and sintilimab combined interventional treatment (BeSiIT) and L envatinib and sintilimab combined interventional treatment (LeSiIT) are two commonly used therapeutic regimens for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical practice.
aimTo compare the clinical efficacy and safety of BeSiIT and LeSiIT for the treatment of intermediate and advanced HCC.
methodsPatients diagnosed with intermediate-advanced HCC and initially treated with BeSiIT or LeSiIT in the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between February 2020 and July 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rate, and treatment-related adverse events.
resultsTotal 127 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups. Twenty-eight and fifty patients in the BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups, respectively, were assessed after 1:2 propensity score matching. PFS and OS rates were not significantly different between the two groups. No significant variations were noted in ORRs or DCRs according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and modified RECIST. BeSiIT group showed a better conversion rate than the LeSiIT group (
conclusionIn intermediate-to-advanced HCC, the BeSiIT and LeSiIT groups exhibited acceptable toxicities and comparable PFS, OS, and ORR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.