ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2024
Digital identification and adulteration analysis of Codonopsis Radix and Stellariae Radix based on the "digital identity" of chemical compositions.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Spectral Evidence Learning from Vis/NIR Imaging for Non-Destructive Authentication of Herbal Medicines.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Sinomenii caulis and Menispermi rhizoma Based on Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry.Analytical science advances · 2025Article
- Identification of Rubiae Radix et Rhizoma and Its Adulterants Based on "Mass Spectrometry Matrix".Analytical science advances · 2025Article
- Traceability and Adulteration Analysis of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium Based on "Digital Identity Card" and UHPLC-QTOF-MS Analysis.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Under the background of digitalization of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), this study aimed to realize the digital identification and adulteration analysis of Codonopsis Radix (CR) and Stellariae Radix (SR) based on chemical analysis. Methods: This study combined digitalization concepts and chemical analysis and conducted a chemical analysis of CR and SR from different batches based on UHPLC-QTOF-MS Results: The results showed that based on the "digital identities" of CR and SR, the digital identification of CR, SR, and positive samples can be realized at the individual level of TCM efficiently and accurately, even if 3% of SR in the mixed samples can still be identified efficiently and accurately. Moreover, 1 of the 12 batches of market samples was identified as an adulterated sample. Conclusion: It proved that the identification and adulteration analysis of two herbs can be realized efficiently and quickly through the "digital identities" of chemical compositions. It has important reference significance for developing the digital identification of CR and SR at the individual level of Chinese medicine based on the "digital identity" of chemical compositions, which was beneficial to the construction of digital quality control of CR and SR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.