Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575391›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

A real-world study of adverse drug reactions of two isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitor based on the US FDA adverse event reporting system and VigiAccess databases.

Mengmeng Peng, Qian Guo, Zihan Dang, Baiquan Zhang, Manjuan Li, Zixuan Wang, Xuemian Lu, Jie Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mengmeng Peng *Department of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qian Guo *Department of Rhinolohy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zihan DangDepartment of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Baiquan ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Manjuan LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Zixuan WangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xuemian LuDepartment of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jie LinDepartment of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitor drugs (Enasidenib, Ivosidenib) restore normal metabolism and epigenetic regulation in cells, offering a precision-targeted therapeutic option for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with IDH mutations by specifically inhibiting mutated IDH enzymes. This research evaluates the relationship between adverse drug reactions (ADR) and the use of two isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors by using the database from the World Health Organization (WHO) VigiAccess and compares the characteristics of ADRs of the two drugs. Methods: This study design used the retrospective descriptive analysis. We calculated the ratio of ADRs recorded in reports to compare the same points and different points in ADRs between two medications. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and reported odds ratio were used to evaluate the relationship between these two isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitor medications and adverse events. Results: Overall, during the search, 4,072 adverse events related to two types of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors were reported in VigiAccess. The results revealed that the top 10 most common AEs were off label use, death, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, acute myeloid leukemia, drug ineffective, differentiation syndrome, platelet count decreased and decreased appetite. Compared two drugs, enasidinib had the highest adverse reaction reporting rate in general disorders and administration site conditions while ivosidenib had the highest adverse drug reactions reporting rate in injury, poisoning and procedural complications. Conclusion: Based on the current comparative observational studies, the ADR reports received by the World Health Organization, Food and Drug Administration for these drugs list common and specific adverse drug reactions. Clinical doctors should develop individualized treatment plans based on the adverse reactions of different drugs and the specific conditions of patients to promote the rational use of these expensive medications.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionAMLisocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitorpharmacovigilanceWHO-VigiAccess

Identifiers

PMID39575391
PMCPMC11578689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.