ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Disproportionality analysis of oesophageal toxicity associated with oral bisphosphonates using the FAERS database (2004-2023).
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating combined acupuncture and antiresorptive therapy in Chinese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Signal Detection and Temporal Analysis of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Hepatotoxicity: A Pharmacovigilance Study Integrating Bayesian Belief-Propagation Network and Frequentist Metrics.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Signal detection of drug-induced esophageal ulcer across 20 years of real-world study: Focus on 49 high-risk medicines.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Combined Nanoparticle-Based Delivery of Estrogens and Raloxifen in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A real-world pharmacovigilance study of romidepsin based on FDA adverse event reporting system database.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Safety assessment of ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a real-world analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Disproportionality Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with IL-1 Inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Drug-induced peripheral nerve palsy: a real-world study based on FAERS data from 2004 to the third quarter of 2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study analyzed the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to investigate the correlation between oral bisphosphonates (BPs) and oesophageal adverse events (AEs). Methods: We systematically extracted data on adverse reactions to oral alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate from the FAERS database, covering the period from the 2004 Q1 to the 2023 Q4. The role_code of AEs mainly includes primary suspect (PS), secondary suspect (SS), concomitant (C), and interaction (I). This study targeted reports with a role_code of "PS." According to the FDA deduplication rule, the latest FDA_DT is selected when the CASEID is the same, and the higher PRIMARYID is selected when the CASEID and FDA_DT are the same. Our analysis leveraged four statistical methods, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), to assess the relationship between oral bisphosphonates and oesophageal AEs. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to evaluate the cumulative incidence of oesophageal toxicity, while the log-rank test examined the temporal onset profiles of these toxicities. Additionally, the Pearson chi-squared test was employed to identify any significant differences in mortality and hospitalization rates associated with the oesophageal AEs caused by these medications. Results: The FAERS database had 41,590 AE reports for oral BPs, with 3,497 (8.41%) related to oesophageal AEs. Our findings indicate that oral BPs are disproportionately associated with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal system AEs at the system organ class (SOC) level. The adverse events identified at the preferred terms (PTs) level encompassed conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, oesophagitis, and oesophageal pain. A significant divergence in the cumulative incidence of oesophageal AEs was observed among patients treated with the three different oral bisphosphonates, as confirmed by the log-rank test ( Conclusion: The study establishes a significant link between oral BPs and oesophageal toxicity, highlighting the need for further research into the mechanisms of BP-induced oesophageal toxicity and potential preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.