Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575360›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Single-Dose Versus Extended Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

André Fernandes, Jae Y Park, Liron Leibovitch, Iqbal F Sayudo, Elcio Machinski, Jesica Sudarman, Heather Tetley, Khalid Malik Tabassum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Single-DoseIndian journal of orthopaedics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

André FernandesTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, GBR.
Jae Y ParkTrauma and Orthopedics, Imperial College London, London, GBR.
Liron LeibovitchMedicine, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, ISR.
Iqbal F SayudoMedicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, IDN.
Elcio MachinskiOrthopedics, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, BRA.
Jesica SudarmanMedicine, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, IDN.
Heather TetleyTrauma and Orthopedics, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, GBR.
Khalid Malik TabassumTrauma and Orthopedics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty remains debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of single-dose versus extended antibiotic prophylaxis. Studies assessing these strategies for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), revision surgery, and superficial surgical site infections were selected from systematic searches in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Results were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis models. Nine studies were included, covering 295,654 patients - 125,489 undergoing total knee arthroplasty and 172,055 undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A significant statistical difference in the incidence of PJI favored single-dose over extended antibiotic prophylaxis (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.98; I² = 0%). Our meta-analysis suggests that a single-dose prophylactic antibiotic regimen may be preferable for reducing PJI incidence in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Indexed as

antibioticsarthroplastyhiphip replacementkneeperiprosthetic joint infectionprophylaxissurgical site infectionsystematic reviewsystematic review and meta analysis

Identifiers

PMID39575360
PMCPMC11580755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.