ArticleCureus2024
Accuracy of Cup Alignment in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison Between Portable Navigation and Goniometer.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy and risk factors for poor cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between supine and lateral registration using a portable navigation system.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of the accuracy for cup positioning between portable inertial navigation systems and manual methods during total hip arthroplasty in the anterolateral supine position.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Comparison of accuracy between Navbit Sprint and AR-CT-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Cup Alignment in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison Between Portable Navigation and Goniometer.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Navigation systems, including portable navigation systems, used for total hip arthroplasty (THA) are useful for achieving higher cup alignment accuracy. NAVBIT, a newly available portable navigation system, uses a unique registration method, the table tilt registration. However, its accuracy is unclear. This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether THA with a portable navigation system in the lateral position with the flip technique is more accurate than THA with a cup goniometer in the supine or lateral positions. Methodology This study included 96 consecutive patients (77 women, 19 men) who underwent primary cementless THA using either a portable navigation system in the lateral position with the flip technique or a cup goniometer in the supine or lateral positions. The average age of the patients was 66.8 years (range = 29-91) and the average body mass index was 24.6 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.