ArticleWearable technologies2024
Design, modeling, and preliminary evaluation of a 3D-printed wrist-hand grasping orthosis for stroke survivors.
Article in Wearable technologies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic efficacy of 3 dimensions printed orthoses on wrist-hand flexor spasticity in post-stroke hemiplegia: a multi-center stratified clinical study.BMC neurology · 2025Trial
- Design, modeling, and preliminary evaluation of a 3D-printed wrist-hand grasping orthosis for stroke survivors.Wearable technologies · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke causes neurological and physical impairment in millions of people around the world every year. To better comprehend the upper-limb needs and challenges stroke survivors face and the issues associated with existing technology and formulate ideas for a technological solution, the authors conversed with 153 members of the ecosystem (60 neuro patients, 30 caregivers, and 63 medical providers). Patients fell into two populations depending on their upper-limb impairment: spastic (stiff, clenched hands) and flaccid (limp hands). For this work, the authors chose to focus on the second category and developed a set of design constraints based on the information collected through customer discovery. With these in mind, they designed and prototyped a 3D-printed powered wrist-hand grasping orthosis (exoskeleton) to aid in recovery. The orthosis is easily custom-sized based on two parameters and derived anatomical relationships. The researchers tested the prototype on a survivor of stroke and modeled the kinematic behavior of the orthosis with and without load. The prototype neared or exceeded the target design constraints and was able to grasp objects consistently and stably, as well as exercise the patients' hands. In particular, donning time was only 42 s, as compared to the next fastest time of 3 min reported in literature. This device has the potential for effective neurorehabilitation in a home setting, and it lays the foundation for clinical trials and further device development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.