Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575264›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Structured magnetic resonance imaging and endoanal ultrasound anal fistulas reporting template (SMART): An interdisciplinary Delphi consensus.

Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska, Pankaj Garg, Anders Mellgren, Antonino Spinelli, Stephanie Breukink, Francesca Iacobellis, Małgorzata Kołodziejczak, Przemysław Ciesielski, Christian Jenssen, SMART Collaborative Group and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Imaging of perineal suppurations: a pictorial essay.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  4. Endoanal Ultrasound in Perianal Crohn's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Iwona Sudoł-SzopińskaDepartment of Radiology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw 02-637, Poland.
Pankaj GargDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Garg Fistula Research Institute, Panchkula 134113, Haryana, India. drgargpankaj@gmail.com.
Anders MellgrenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Antonino SpinelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy.
Stephanie BreukinkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht and NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, the Netherlands.
Francesca IacobellisDepartment of General and Emergency Radiology, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples 80131, Campania, Italy.
Małgorzata KołodziejczakWarsaw Proctology Center, St. Elizabeth Hospital, Warsaw 02-616, Poland.
Przemysław CiesielskiWarsaw Proctology Center, St. Elizabeth Hospital, Warsaw 02-616, Poland.
Christian JenssenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg 15344, Brandenburg, Germany and Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound, Neuruppin 16186, Brandenburg, Germany.
SMART Collaborative Group
Giulio Aniello SantoroThird Referral Pelvic Floor Center, Division of Surgery 2, AULSS n.2 Marca Trevigiana, DISCOG University of Padua, Treviso, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is still considerable heterogeneity regarding which features of cryptoglandular anal fistula on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) are relevant to surgical decision-making. As a consequence, the quality and completeness of the report are highly dependent on the training and experience of the examiners.

aimTo develop a structured MRI and EAUS template (SMART) reporting the minimum dataset of information for the treatment of anal fistulas.

methodsThis modified Delphi survey based on the RAND-UCLA appropriateness for consensus-building was conducted between May and August 2023. One hundred and fifty-one articles selected from a systematic review of the literature formed the database to generate the evidence-based statements for the Delphi study. Fourteen questions were anonymously voted by an interdisciplinary multidisciplinary group for a maximum of three iterative rounds. The degree of agreement was scored on a numeric 0-10 scale. Group consensus was defined as a score ≥ 8 for ≥ 80% of the panelists.

resultsEleven scientific societies (3 radiological and 8 surgical) endorsed the study. After three rounds of voting, the experts (69 colorectal surgeons, 23 radiologists, 2 anatomists, and 1 gastroenterologist) achieved consensus for 12 of 14 statements (85.7%). Based on the results of the Delphi process, the six following features of anal fistulas were included in the SMART: Primary tract, secondary extension, internal opening, presence of collection, coexisting lesions, and sphincters morphology.

conclusionA structured template, SMART, was developed to standardize imaging reporting of fistula-in-ano in a simple, systematic, time-efficient way, providing the minimum dataset of information and visual diagram useful to referring physicians.

Indexed as

Anal fistulasEndoanal ultrasoundFistula-in-anoMagnetic resonance imagingReportingTemplate

Identifiers

PMID39575264
PMCPMC11577389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.