ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Integrated analysis of single-cell, spatial and bulk RNA-sequencing identifies a cell-death signature for predicting the outcomes of head and neck cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics identify SPP1 + trophoblast necroptosis as a potential contributor to late-onset preeclampsia via SPP1-CD44-mediated interaction with macrophages.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Spatial transcriptomics and artificial intelligence: a scoping review of emerging applications in head and neck pathology.Head and neck pathology · 2026Article
- Constructing a Pan-Cancer Prognostic Model via Machine Learning Based on Immunogenic Cell Death Genes and Identifying NT5E as a Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- A comprehensive characterization of metabolic signatures-hypoxia, glycolysis, and lactylation-in non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Machine learning-driven transcriptomic and single-cell profiling of programed cell death patterns in colon cancer.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cell death plays an essential role in carcinogenesis, but its function in the recurrence and postoperative prognosis of head and neck cancer (HNC), which ranks as the 7 Methods: Data from five main subtypes of HNC related single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) were recruited to establish a single-cell atlas, and the distribution of cell death models (CDMs) across different tissues as well as cell subtypes were analyzed. Bulk RNA-seq from the Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) dataset was subjected to a machine learning-based integrative procedure for constructing a consensus cell death-related signature risk score (CDRscore) model and validated by external data. The biofunctions including different expression analysis, immune cell infiltration, genomic mutations, enrichment analysis as well as cellchat analysis were compared between the high- and low- risk score groups categorized by this CDRscore model. Finally, samples from laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) were conducted by spatial transcriptomics (ST) to further validate the results of CDRscore model. Results: T cells from HNC patients manifested the highest levels of cell death while HPV infection attenuates malignant cell death based on single-cell atlas. CDMs are positively correlated with the tumor-cell stemness, immune-related score and T cells are infiltrated. A CDRscore model was established based on the transcription of ten cell death prognostic genes ( Conclusion: The CDRscore model could be utilized as a powerful prognostic indicator for HNC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.