Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575245›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer: a real-world retrospective study.

Qian Xu, Dan Yi, Caiyan Jia, Fanming Kong, Yingjie Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Response to First-Line Chemotherapy Predicts Response to Maintenance Avelumab Therapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian Xu *Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Dan Yi *Department of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Caiyan JiaDepartment of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Fanming KongDepartment of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Yingjie JiaDepartment of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy offers new hope for improved survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Although large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to explore the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer, the results are not completely consistent. And the strict inclusion criteria of RCTs lead to limited extrapolation. Therefore, it is of great significance to continue to conduct real-world studies comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with HER-2 negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) who received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone between January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups. Results: A total of 210 patients were enrolled in the combination treatment group (n=100) and chemotherapy alone group (n=110). After 12 months of follow-up, median PFS (mPFS) was 270 days (95%CI 177.510-362.490) in the chemotherapy alone group and 357 days (95%CI 250.103-463.897) in the combination treatment group (P<0.05). The median OS (mOS) was 14.9 months (95%CI 9.831-17.769) in the chemotherapy alone group and 15 months (95%CI 12.386-17.614) in the combination treatment group (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in ORR between two groups (P=0.050). The DCR was 14.5% in the chemotherapy alone group and 38% in the combination treatment group (P<0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that primary tumor location of GEJC, ECOG PS of 1, without liver metastasis, and chemotherapy plus ICIs were associated with PFS benefit. Cox multivariate analysis showed that only surgery or not was correlated with patients' prognosis (P<0.05). Most of AEs were grade 1-2 and manageable. Conclusions: Compared with chemotherapy alone, first-line ICIs combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC could greatly prolong PFS, but OS was not significantly improved, and the AEs were manageable.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionImmunotherapyStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorschemotherapygastric cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorsoverall survivalprogression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID39575245
PMCPMC11578984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.