Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575214›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2024

Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Arterial Dissections Following Rotarex Atherectomy: Results of the iDissection Rotarex Study.

Nicolas W Shammas, W John Shammas, Gail A Shammas, Sue Jones-Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolas W ShammasCardiovascular Research Department, Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Davenport, Iowa.
W John ShammasCardiovascular Research Department, Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Davenport, Iowa.
Gail A ShammasCardiovascular Research Department, Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Davenport, Iowa.
Sue Jones-MillerCardiovascular Research Department, Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Davenport, Iowa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on the mechanism of the Rotarex Rotational Excisional Atherectomy System in treating femoropopliteal arterial disease. The Rotarex iDissection study is a prospective, single center study evaluating the extent of excision and dissection in de novo and restenotic (not in-stent) lesions of the femoropopliteal arteries in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease were prospectively enrolled in the Rotarex iDissection study at a single US center after obtaining informed consent. The study was approved by a central ethics committee. Quantitative vascular angiography and intravascular ultrasound images were analyzed by an independent core laboratory. The Eagle Eye Platinum ST intravascular ultrasound (Phillips) was used to identify the depth (A, B, C for intima, media, and adventitia, respectively) and arc of dissections (1 and 2 for <180° and ≥180°, respectively) using the iDissection classification. Statistical significance was determined by a Results: A total of 19 patients (20 procedures) were enrolled by 1 endovascular specialist. There were 57.9% men with mean age of 71.1 ± 9.6 years. Of the patients, 31.6% had diabetes mellitus, and 84.2% were current or past smokers. Thirty percent of treated vessels were chronic total occlusions. A total of 10 patients received stents (2 covered stents due to perforation, 6 due to National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Type C dissections, and 2 were primary stenting). Two distal embolizations occurred; one was attributed to the Rotarex, and both were treated with no adverse consequences. Angiographic baseline stenosis was 74.7% ± 25.6%; after Rotarex, 48.7% ± 14.8%; and after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), 16.0% ± 6.2%. Baseline minimal lumen diameter was 1.0 ± 1.0 mm; after Rotarex, 2.4 ± 1.1 mm; and after PTA, 4.4 ± 1.0 mm. Angiographically, there was 1 type A dissection at baseline; 1 A, 1 B, and 2 C after Rotarex, and 3 A and 5 C after final adjunctive PTA. Intravascular ultrasound revealed a reference diameter of 6.2 ± 1.0 mm; 70% of patients had adventitial dissections. The mean arc of calcium was 221° ± 39.4° (moderate to severe calcium). Conclusions: The Rotarex device is an effective atherectomy device in treating complex femoropopliteal arterial disease. A high frequency of adventitial dissections is seen with the Rotarex. The long-term outcomes of this finding need to be further studied.

Indexed as

adventitiadissectionintravascular ultrasoundRotarex atherectomystentsuperficial femoral arteryvessel preparation

Identifiers

PMID39575214
PMCPMC11576371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.