Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575178›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

VINNA for neonates: Orientation independence through latent augmentations.

Leonie Henschel, David Kügler, Lilla Zöllei, Martin Reuter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Deep infant brain segmentation from multi-contrast MRI.Conference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonie HenschelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
David KüglerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Lilla ZölleiA.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Martin ReuterGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB030006 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Susie Yi Huang · 2020 to 2026
$10.9M
Deep Learning Algorithms for FreeSurferR01AG064027 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FISCHL, BRUCE · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Continuous longitudinal atlas construction for the study of brain developmentR01HD109436 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Lilla Zollei · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
SILICON GRAPHICS PRISM EXTREME 128P/1TBS10RR023043 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SORENSEN, ALMA GREGORY · 2006 to 2006
$1.5M
Novel Bioinformatics Strategies to Study Associations Between Genetic Variants and Neuroanatomical ShapeR01LM012719 · NLM · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SABUNCU, MERT RORY · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
Imaging the neurodevelopmental trajectory of depression and anxiety disorders with HCP protocolsR56MH121426 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WHITFIELD-GABRIELI, SUSAN, YENDIKI, ANASTASIA · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023043NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064027NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB030006NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD109436NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH121426NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A robust, fast, and accurate segmentation of neonatal brain images is highly desired to better understand and detect changes during development and disease, specifically considering the rise in imaging studies for this cohort. Yet, the limited availability of ground truth datasets, lack of standardized acquisition protocols, and wide variations of head positioning in the scanner pose challenges for method development. A few automated image analysis pipelines exist for newborn brain Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) segmentation, but they often rely on time-consuming non-linear spatial registration procedures and require resampling to a common resolution, subject to loss of information due to interpolation and down-sampling. Without registration and image resampling, variations with respect to head positions and voxel resolutions have to be addressed differently. In deep learning, external augmentations such as rotation, translation, and scaling are traditionally used to artificially expand the representation of spatial variability, which subsequently increases both the training dataset size and robustness. However, these transformations in the image space still require resampling, reducing accuracy specifically in the context of label interpolation. We recently introduced the concept of resolution-independence with the Voxel-size Independent Neural Network framework, VINN. Here, we extend this concept by additionally shifting all rigid-transforms into the network architecture with a four degree of freedom (4-DOF) transform module, enabling resolution-aware internal augmentations (VINNA) for deep learning. In this work, we show that VINNA (i) significantly outperforms state-of-the-art external augmentation approaches, (ii) effectively addresses the head variations present specifically in newborn datasets, and (iii) retains high segmentation accuracy across a range of resolutions (0.5-1.0 mm). Furthermore, the 4-DOF transform module together with internal augmentations is a powerful, general approach to implement spatial augmentation without requiring image or label interpolation. The specific network application to newborns will be made publicly available as VINNA4neonates.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputational neuroimagingdeep learninghigh-resolutionnewborn brainstructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID39575178
PMCPMC11576933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.