Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575140›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in applied mathematics and statistics2022

A Survey of Statistical Methods for Microbiome Data Analysis.

Kevin C Lutz, Shuang Jiang, Michael L Neugent, Nicole J De Nisco, Xiaowei Zhan, Qiwei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Computational Metagenomics: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Associations Between Walking Speed and Gut Microbiome Composition in Older Men From the MrOS Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin C LutzDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Shuang JiangDepartment of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States.
Michael L NeugentDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Nicole J De NiscoDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Xiaowei ZhanDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Qiwei LiDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS--SPORE IN LUNG CANCERP50CA070907 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HEYMACH, JOHN V., MINNA, JOHN D. · 1996 to 2024
$57.4M
UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MELANIE H. COBB · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
Developing computational algorithms for histopathological image analysisR01GM140012 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIAO, GUANGHUA · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
Defining the dynamics of urobiome structure and function in postmenopausal women and its role in recurrent UTI susceptibilityR01DK131267 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI DE NISCO, NICOLE JANELL · 2021 to 2025
$1.5M
Developing novel algorithms for spatial molecular profiling technologiesR01GM141519 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIAO, GUANGHUA · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Tools for integrative genomics and disease association study for the X chromosomeR01GM126479 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI LIU, DAJIANG · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
Methods to Identify, Validate & Interpret GWAS Loci in Multi-ethnic Meta-analysisR56HG011035 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI LIU, DAJIANG · 2021 to 2021
$576k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543NCI NIH HHS P50 CA070907NHGRI NIH HHS R56 HG011035NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK131267NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126479NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140012NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, numerous statistical methods have been developed for analyzing microbiome data generated from high-throughput next-generation sequencing technology. Microbiome data are typically characterized by zero inflation, overdispersion, high dimensionality, and sample heterogeneity. Three popular areas of interest in microbiome research requiring statistical methods that can account for the characterizations of microbiome data include detecting differentially abundant taxa across phenotype groups, identifying associations between the microbiome and covariates, and constructing microbiome networks to characterize ecological associations of microbes. These three areas are referred to as differential abundance analysis, integrative analysis, and network analysis, respectively. In this review, we highlight available statistical methods for differential abundance analysis, integrative analysis, and network analysis that have greatly advanced microbiome research. In addition, we discuss each method's motivation, modeling framework, and application.

Indexed as

differential abundance analysisintegrative analysismetagenomics datamicrobiome datanetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID39575140
PMCPMC11581570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.