Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39575115›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

Nanoscale Connectomics Annotation Standards Framework.

Nicole K Guittari, Miguel E Wimbish, Patricia K Rivlin, Mark A Hinton, Jordan K Matelsky, Victoria A Rose, Jorge L Rivera, Nicole E Stock, Brock A Wester, Erik C Johnson and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicole K GuittariResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Miguel E WimbishResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Patricia K RivlinResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Mark A HintonResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Jordan K MatelskyResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Victoria A RoseResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Jorge L RiveraResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Nicole E StockResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Brock A WesterResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Erik C JohnsonResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
William R Gray-RoncalResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.

Funding

Boss: A cloud-based data archive for electron microscopy and x-ray microtomographyR24MH114785 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BROCK A. WESTER · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
Big-Data Electron-microscopy for Novel Community Hypotheses: Measuring And Retrieving Knowledge (BENCHMARK)R01MH126684 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY RONCAL, WILLIAM R · 2021 to 2022
$1.3M
SABER: Scalable Analytics for Brain Exploration Research using X-Ray Microtomography and Electron MicroscopyR24MH114799 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY RONCAL, WILLIAM R · 2017 to 2019
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126684NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH114785NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH114799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of large-scale, high-resolution datasets from Electron Microscopy (EM) and X-ray Microtomography (XRM) lies in their ability to reveal neural structures and synaptic connectivity, which is critical for understanding the brain. Effectively managing these complex and rapidly increasing datasets will enable new scientific insights, facilitate querying, and support secondary use across the neuroscience community. However, without effective neurodata standards that permit use of these data across multiple systems and workflows, these valuable and costly datasets risk being underutilized especially as they surpass petascale levels. These standards will promote data sharing through accessible interfaces, allow researchers to build on each other's work, and guide the development of tools and capabilities that are interoperable. Herein we outline a standards framework for creating and managing annotations originating and derived from high-resolution volumetric imaging and connectomic datasets, focusing on ensuring Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) practices. The goal is to enhance collaborative efforts, boost the reliability of findings, and enable comparative analysis across growing datasets of different species and modalities. We have formed a global working group with academic and industry partners in the high-resolution volumetric data generation and analysis community, focused on identifying gaps in current EM and XRM data pipelines, and refining outlines and platforms for standardizing EM and XRM methods. This focus considers existing and past community approaches and includes examining neuronal entities, biological components, and associated metadata, while emphasizing adaptability and fostering collaboration.

Indexed as

ConnectomicsData StandardsElectron MicroscopyFAIR DataNeuroanatomyX-ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID39575115
PMCPMC11581105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.