ArticleCureus2024
Prevention and Control of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI): A Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strengthening Patient-Safety in ERAS Pathways: An Evidence-Informed Framework for Simulation-Based Nursing Practice Development in Acute Surgical Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Summary of best evidence for CAUTI evidence-based nursing measures and localized quality improvement innovations.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Best Evidence for Preventing Urinary Tract Infections and Optimizing Care in Adults with Indwelling Urinary Catheters.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis patient safety and quality improvement report outlines the successful reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) through a comprehensive interdisciplinary team approach. It emphasizes the implementation of best practices and the involvement of both patients and their families in catheter care. The project was conducted at Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City, the largest rehabilitation facility in the Middle East, with 511 beds and over 20 inpatient units.
aimThe primary objective of this project was to assess gaps in current CAUTI prevention practices and implement effective strategies to reduce infection rates. By adopting quality improvement methodologies from the Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI) and the Deming Four-Stage Cycle, the aim was to prevent CAUTIs and improve patient safety and clinical outcomes.
methodUrinary catheters, commonly used for patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction and sacral deep pressure injuries, posed a high risk of infection, with a daily infection risk of 3-7%. Despite available preventive measures, the facility experienced a high average CAUTI rate of 1.28/1000 catheter days from 2021 to mid-2023. This project involved the systematic identification of gaps, the adoption of evidence-based practices, and the engagement of healthcare staff, patients, and families in rigorous CAUTI prevention efforts.
resultThe project resulted in a significant reduction in the CAUTI rate, decreasing from 1.28 infections per 1000 catheter days pre-intervention to 0.42 infections per 1000 catheter days post-intervention. This improvement highlights the effectiveness of collaborative efforts and evidence-based interventions in controlling and preventing CAUTIs.
conclusionThe findings of this project demonstrate that CAUTI prevention is achievable through a coordinated approach involving healthcare providers, strong evidence-based interventions, and the active participation of patients and families. This collaborative model led to better patient safety outcomes and significantly reduced CAUTI rates, showing the importance of comprehensive care strategies in mitigating preventable patient harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.