ArticleCureus2024
Prevalence of Needle Stick Injuries Among Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Care Centre in Kochi, India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Needle stick injuries (NSIs) are a prevalent occupational hazard among healthcare workers (HCWs) globally. Strict adherence to standard work precautions by all HCWs at all times and the implementation of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are measures for reducing the occurrence of NSIs. However, NSIs are poorly documented in the literature and may be a cause of morbidity in the long run. Objectives Our study aims to determine the prevalence of NSIs among HCWs and its associated factors in a tertiary healthcare centre in Kerala, India. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 210 consenting HCWs who worked in different blocks of a tertiary care hospital in the Ernakulam district, Kerala, India. Data was collected using a semi-structured questionnaire through personal interviews. The questionnaire gathered sociodemographic information, details regarding NSI occurrences over the past one year, the devices involved and PEP. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 20.0, Armonk, NY), and categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The chi-square test and binomial logistic regression were employed to identify factors associated with NSIs. Results The prevalence of NSIs among HCWs in the past 12 months was 31% (65 out of 210), with an average of 1.34 NSIs per HCW per year. The most commonly involved device was the intravenous (IV) cannula, and 22 out of 65 (33.8%) injuries occurred during injection procedures. A majority (45 out of 65; 69.23%) of HCWs reported NSI and 51 of them (78.4%) received PEP. Logistic regression analysis showed that HCWs aged over 31 years (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 3.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-8.42) were independently associated with a higher occurrence of NSIs. Conclusion Our findings underscore the importance of implementing comprehensive safety measures, including strict adherence to standard work precautions and timely administration of PEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.