ArticleCureus2024
Fishbone Foreign Body Ingestion With Gastric Impaction and Intestinal Micro-perforation in an Adult Female: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastric Polyposis Due to Foreign Bodies andReports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Concealed Peritonitis Due to Stomach Perforation from a Fish Otolith: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Emergency Laparoscopic Removal of an Ingested Fishbone Perforating the Stomach After Endoscopy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body ingestion of fishbones is a very common complaint where most foreign bodies travel safely through the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) without any serious complications. However, its clinical presentation is nonspecific, and its clinical severity can vary widely, thus requiring the use of conservative and or invasive treatment modalities. In this case report, we present a case of a 42-year-old female who reported eating fish two days prior to presenting with upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) foreign body impaction in addition to a lower GIT micro-perforation secondary to fishbone ingestion, both of which were successfully managed with conservative, nonsurgical treatment modalities. Impaction, perforation, or obstruction of fishbone foreign bodies often occur at GIT angulations or narrowing. Clinical diagnosis of foreign body ingestion requires the use of multiple modalities such as a detailed history, physical exam, radiographic evaluation, and endoscopic evaluation as needed. Treatment depends on multiple factors and can be conservative or surgical in nature. Fishbone foreign body ingestion is a common complaint and rarely leads to severe complications. However, its diagnosis can be difficult without an explicit history highlighting ingestion of fishbones and requires the use of appropriate imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) scans. Subsequent management may require conservative or invasive treatment modalities based on the location of the fishbone, and the presence or absence of accompanying complications such as peritoneal signs, sepsis, and radiographic identification of bowel perforation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.