ArticleCureus2024
Prevalence of Primary Dysmenorrhea and Its Effect on the Quality of Life Among Female Students at Umm Al-Qura University.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empowering Women Through Pharmaceutical Education: A New Approach to Premenstrual Syndrome.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Silent struggles: association between primary dysmenorrhea and health-related quality of life among adolescent girls in Lusaka District, Zambia.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Impact of dysmenorrhea on academic performance and quality of life among female medical students: A pilot study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Anti-Dysmenorrhea Effects and Safety of Guizhi Fuling Capsules for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Impact of Dysmenorrhea Severity on Mental Wellbeing and Quality of Life Among Saudi Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Non-Pharmacological Therapies for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Primary dysmenorrhea is a common menstrual disorder causing significant physical and emotional discomfort, particularly among young women. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea, its associated symptoms, and its impact on the quality of life among female students at Umm Al-Qura University in Saudi Arabia. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted among 620 female students aged 18-30 using a validated, self-reported questionnaire. Data collected included demographic information, menstrual history, dysmenorrhea characteristics, and quality of life measured by the Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12). The confidence interval (CI) was maintained at 95%, and a p-value of <0.05 was selected as the statistically significant level in all tests. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27 (Released 2020; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). Results The prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea was 83.7%. Of the participants, 51.1% reported moderate pain, while 32.6% experienced severe pain (pain score 8-10). Premenstrual syndrome was reported by 71.8%. Pain significantly impacted physical functioning, with 75.5% reporting decreased productivity due to menstrual pain, and 76.3% noted emotional problems. Family history of menstrual pain was present in 53.2% of the participants, and BMI had no significant correlation with pain severity. Conclusions Primary dysmenorrhea significantly affects the quality of life and academic performance of female students. Effective management strategies and increased awareness are essential to reduce its impact on young women's lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.