ArticleCureus2024
When Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Changed the Diagnosis of a Young Patient With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a significant cause of acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and sudden death, particularly in young women and individuals with few conventional atherosclerotic risk factors, necessitating a high degree of suspicion. The most common risk factors for SCAD include atherosclerosis, females in the peripartum period, autoimmune inflammatory diseases, and connective tissue diseases. We present an unusual case of a young man who was initially suspected of having myocarditis, but cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) revealed an ischemic pattern in late gadolinium enhancement. A coronary angiography (CA) led to the diagnosis of SCAD. We report a case of a 28-year-old male who presented with typical chest pain on and off for the past three months. Since the patient had no medical or cardiac history, the previous computed tomography CA (CTCA) revealed normal coronaries, raising the suspicion of myocarditis. Consequently, we performed a CMR, which revealed subendocardial delayed enhancement in the apical anterior and mid-anteroseptal segments, thereby ruling out myocarditis. The decision was made here to perform a coronary angiogram, which led to the diagnosis of SCAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.