ReviewCureus2024
Comparative Efficacy of MRI and CT in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updates in Management of Acute Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Injury.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of MRI-based bone-targeted sequences and computed tomography for preoperative assessment of midfacial trauma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Observational
- Characteristics of head injuries in children at King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital, Jeddah: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Intra-hospital MRI transport in neurocritical patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: complications and clinical impact with predominant continuation of care.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Review
- Serial assessment of the novel biomarker MFGE8 in comparison with GFAP for predicting severity and outcome after traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, and accurate imaging is essential for effective diagnosis, management, and prognosis. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to computed tomography (CT) in assessing TBI across various severities. Through a comprehensive search strategy, studies were selected that directly compared MRI and CT in TBI diagnosis, incorporating advanced MRI techniques such as susceptibility-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. The findings confirm that while CT is indispensable in acute settings for the rapid identification of life-threatening conditions such as hemorrhage and skull fractures, MRI offers superior sensitivity for detecting subtle lesions, microbleeds, and diffuse axonal injury. MRI techniques, including magnetic resonance spectroscopy, demonstrated the ability to detect metabolic changes in normal-appearing white matter, which were predictive of long-term neurological outcomes. Additionally, the integration of biomarkers, such as imaging modalities, showed the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary CT scans. Despite the limitations related to study heterogeneity and the exclusion of non-English studies, this review underscores the complementary roles of MRI and CT in TBI management, suggesting that a combined approach can provide the most thorough assessment and improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on large-scale trials to further refine the clinical application of these imaging modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.