Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39574979›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Comparative Efficacy of MRI and CT in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Muath M Dabas, Abrar D Alameri, Noor M Mohamed, Rabia Mahmood, Dong Hwi Kim, Mubushra Samreen, Ji Woo Kim, Abdullah Shehryar, Samantha Gyambrah, Adees W Bedros and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Muath M DabasSurgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Abrar D AlameriMedicine, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Noor M MohamedSurgery, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Rabia MahmoodAccident and Emergency, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, PAK.
Dong Hwi KimInternal Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, KOR.
Mubushra SamreenDiagnostic Radiology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Ji Woo KimMedicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, AUS.
Abdullah ShehryarInternal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Samantha GyambrahPediatrics and Child Health, Ghana Infectious Disease Center, Accra, GHA.
Adees W BedrosInternal Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Abdur RehmanSurgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Safdar KhanSurgery, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, and accurate imaging is essential for effective diagnosis, management, and prognosis. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to computed tomography (CT) in assessing TBI across various severities. Through a comprehensive search strategy, studies were selected that directly compared MRI and CT in TBI diagnosis, incorporating advanced MRI techniques such as susceptibility-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. The findings confirm that while CT is indispensable in acute settings for the rapid identification of life-threatening conditions such as hemorrhage and skull fractures, MRI offers superior sensitivity for detecting subtle lesions, microbleeds, and diffuse axonal injury. MRI techniques, including magnetic resonance spectroscopy, demonstrated the ability to detect metabolic changes in normal-appearing white matter, which were predictive of long-term neurological outcomes. Additionally, the integration of biomarkers, such as imaging modalities, showed the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary CT scans. Despite the limitations related to study heterogeneity and the exclusion of non-English studies, this review underscores the complementary roles of MRI and CT in TBI management, suggesting that a combined approach can provide the most thorough assessment and improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on large-scale trials to further refine the clinical application of these imaging modalities.

Indexed as

ctdiagnostic accuracydiffuse axonal injuryflairgfapmrineuroimagingsubarachnoid hemorrhageswitraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39574979
PMCPMC11579544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.