Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39574932›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior2024

Predicting language dominance in Spanish/English bilingual adults based on relative speech-in-speech recognition scores.

Tiana Cowan, Lauren Calandruccio, Emily Buss, Barbara Rodriguez, Lori J Leibold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tiana CowanBoys Town National Research Hospital, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-1801
Lauren CalandruccioCase Western Reserve University, USA.
Emily BussUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Barbara RodriguezUniversity of New Mexico, USA.
Lori J LeiboldBoys Town National Research Hospital, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH IN HUMAN COMMUNICATION AND ITS DISORDERST32DC000013 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS'HOME · PI Ryan W. McCreery · 1989 to 2026
$4.5M
A TEST OF CHILDREN'S ENGLISH/SPANISH SPEECH PERCEPTION IN NOISE OR SPEECH MASKERSR01DC015056 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI BUSS, EMILY, LEIBOLD, LORI J. · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015056NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Multiple dimensions of language dominance, such as language proficiency and demand for language use, can be reflected in bilinguals' speech-in-speech recognition scores. This paper explores the feasibility of using a novel measure to estimate language dominance for bilinguals: relative speech-in-speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) or the within-person difference in SRTs between their two languages. Method: Participants were 25 Spanish/English bilingual adults ( Analysis: Spearman correlations were used to assess the association between measures. Findings: Relative SRTs were correlated with dominance scores derived from both a questionnaire ( Originality: We tested and validated a novel measure, relative SRTs, to predict language dominance in bilingual adults. This time-efficient method could be used by bilingual researchers interested in assessing language dominance for descriptive or experimental purposes. Significance: Relative SRTs show promise as a valid method to assess language dominance in Spanish/English bilingual adults.

Indexed as

bilingualismlanguage dominancesentence recognitionSpeech-in-speech recognition

Identifiers

PMID39574932
PMCPMC11580830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.