Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39574906›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

An assessment of the European Patient Summary for clinical research: a case study in cardiology.

Gokce Banu Laleci Erturkmen, Ali Anil Sinaci, Tuncay Namli, Machteld J Boonstra, Karim Lekadir, Polyxeni Gkontra, Catherine Chronaki, Rhonda Facile, Rebecca Baker, Rebecca Kush

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gokce Banu Laleci ErturkmenSRDC Software Research & Development and Consultancy Corporation, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ali Anil SinaciSRDC Software Research & Development and Consultancy Corporation, Ankara, Türkiye.
Tuncay NamliSRDC Software Research & Development and Consultancy Corporation, Ankara, Türkiye.
Machteld J BoonstraDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Karim LekadirBarcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Polyxeni GkontraBarcelona Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Catherine ChronakiHL7 Europe Foundation, Brussels, Belgium.
Rhonda FacileClinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Austin, TX, United States.
Rebecca BakerClinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Austin, TX, United States.
Rebecca KushClinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The European Health Data Space (EHDS) initiative was launched to create a unified framework for health data exchange across Europe. Central to this initiative is the European Electronic Health Record Exchange Format, designed to achieve interoperability of electronic health record data across Europe. Despite these advancements, the readiness of current guidelines and implementations, such as the European Patient Summary, to support secondary use in clinical research, particularly in cardiology, remains underexplored. Methods: This study aims to evaluate the European Patient Summary guidelines and their implementations, specifically the HL7 FHIR International Patient Summary Implementation Guide, to determine their suitability for secondary use in clinical research. The focus is on identifying gaps and extensions needed to enhance the utility of the European Patient Summary for building artificial intelligence models in assisting heart failure management. Results: We selected two European Union-funded research projects, DataTools4Heart and AI4HF, that aim to reuse electronic health record data to develop artificial intelligence models for personalized decision support services for heart failure patients. We analyzed their clinical use cases and the specific data items required, and we compared these with the current European Patient Summary guidelines and provided a detailed gap analysis indicating similarities and required extensions. In our gap analysis, we also compared the needs of DataTools4Heart and AI4HF with the HL7 FHIR International Patient Summary Implementation Guide to assess the extensions needed to support clinical research. Discussion: The EHDS is a transformative initiative to establish a European health data ecosystem that supports healthcare delivery and clinical research. Our comparative analysis demonstrates that, with minor extensions, these guidelines have significant potential to facilitate access to electronic healthcare record data for the secondary use, particularly in training AI models. We advocate for the adoption of an International Patient Summary format as a semantically interoperable core set of data elements, which will enhance global clinical research efforts and improve patient outcomes through precision medicine.

Indexed as

clinical researchcommon data modelhealth ecosysteminteroperabilitysecondary use of EHR data

Identifiers

PMID39574906
PMCPMC11580750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.