ArticleResearch square2024
Scale Selection and Machine Learning-based Cell Segmentation and Tracking in Time Lapse Microscopy.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring and tracking of cell motion is a key component for understanding disease mechanisms and evaluating the effects of treatments. Time-lapse optical microscopy has been commonly employed for studying cell cycle phases. However, usual manual cell tracking is very time consuming and has poor reproducibility. Automated cell tracking techniques are challenged by variability of cell region intensity distributions and resolution limitations. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive cell segmentation and tracking methodology. A key contribution of this work is that it employs multi-scale space-time interest point detection and characterization for automatic scale selection and cell segmentation. Another contribution is the use of a neural network with class prototype balancing for detection of cell regions. This work also offers a structured mathematical framework that uses graphs for track generation and cell event detection. We evaluated cell segmentation, detection, and tracking performance of our method on time-lapse sequences of the Cell Tracking Challenge (CTC). We also compared our technique to top performing techniques from CTC. Performance evaluation results indicate that the proposed methodology is competitive with these techniques, and that it generalizes very well to diverse cell types and sizes, and multiple imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.