ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
TomoPicker: Annotation-Efficient Particle Picking in cryo-electron Tomograms.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Particle picking in cryo-electron tomograms (cryo-ET) is crucial for in situ structure detection of macromolecules and protein complexes. The traditional template-matching-based approaches for particle picking suffer from template-specific biases and have low throughput. Given these problems, learning-based solutions are necessary for particle picking. However, the paucity of annotated data for training poses substantial challenges for such learning-based approaches. Moreover, preparing extensively annotated cryo-ET tomograms for particle picking is extremely time-consuming and burdensome. Addressing these challenges, we present TomoPicker, an annotation-efficient particle-picking approach that can effectively pick particles when only a minuscule portion (~ 0.3 - 0.5%) of the total particles in a cellular cryo-ET dataset is provided for training. TomoPicker regards particle picking as a voxel classification problem and solves it with two different positive-unlabeled learning approaches. We evaluated our method on a benchmark cryo-ET dataset of eukaryotic cells, where we observed about 30% improvement by TomoPicker against the most recent state-of-the-art annotation efficient learning-based picking approaches.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.