ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Sufficiency of ITD for (biased) human auditory azimuthal perception.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experiments on human auditory perception have shown that interaural time difference (ITD) is sufficient to generate spatial percepts, even though stimuli containing only the ITD cue are perceived as being emitted from inside the head instead of from external locations at specific azimuths. These experiments are thus interpreted as "lateralization" instead of "localization" tasks. In fact, lateralized spatial perception has been quantified using tasks in which participants have to report their estimates by selecting a putative location inside the head, or matching the perceived position to sounds with a given interaural level difference. Therefore, these estimates are made with respect to internal frames of reference, but it is unclear whether these percepts have any significance for the more ecological problem of locating an external sound source. In order to investigate the link between internalized spatial percepts and sound localization, we designed a new task in which subjects are instructed to report externalized azimuthal location for sounds containing only ITD cues. Despite the mismatch between an internalized percept having to be reported as emanating from an external location, subjects were able to estimate azimuths consistently. Furthermore, normalized estimates were indistinguishable from those obtained using traditional lateralization tasks. Our results revealed a direct relationship between perceived azimuths and ITD, which deviates from that obtained from acoustical analysis of binaural recordings, revealing estimation biases. Intriguingly, these results indicate that externalized percepts are not required for the generation of azimuthal percepts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.