ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Convolutional neural network models describe the encoding subspace of local circuits in auditory cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory cortex encodes information about nonlinear combinations of spectro-temporal sound features. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) provide an architecture for generalizable encoding models that can predict time-varying neural activity evoked by natural sounds with substantially greater accuracy than established models. However, the complexity of CNNs makes it difficult to discern the computational properties that support their improved performance. To address this limitation, we developed a method to visualize the tuning subspace captured by a CNN. Single-unit data was recorded using high channel-count microelectrode arrays from primary auditory cortex (A1) of awake, passively listening ferrets during presentation of a large natural sound set. A CNN was fit to the data, replicating approaches from previous work. To measure the tuning subspace, the dynamic spectrotemporal receptive field (dSTRF) was measured as the locally linear filter approximating the input-output relationship of the CNN at each stimulus timepoint. Principal component analysis was then used to reduce this very large set of filters to a smaller subspace, typically requiring 2-10 filters to account for 90% of dSTRF variance. The stimulus was projected into the subspace for each neuron, and a new model was fit using only the projected values. The subspace model was able to predict time-varying spike rate nearly as accurately as the full CNN. Sensory responses could be plotted in the subspace, providing a compact model visualization. This analysis revealed a diversity of nonlinear responses, consistent with contrast gain control and emergent invariance to spectrotemporal modulation phase. Within local populations, neurons formed a sparse representation by tiling the tuning subspace. Narrow spiking, putative inhibitory neurons showed distinct patterns of tuning that may reflect their position in the cortical circuit. These results demonstrate a conceptual link between CNN and subspace models and establish a framework for interpretation of deep learning-based models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.