ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
A comparison of natalizumab's effects on SDMT between pediatric-onset and adult-onset multiple sclerosis patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Natalizumab for pediatric multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) patients often exhibit a wide range of cognitive deficits. Therefore, therapeutic approaches should aim not only to prevent cognitive decline but also to promote cognitive improvement. Objective: This study aimed to explore the effects of natalizumab (NTZ) on cognitive function, as measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), in both POMS and adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS) patients. Method: A total of 63 patients (34 AOMS and 29 POMS) were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Patients were clinically and radiologically assessed every 6 months, and they completed the SDMT at baseline and after at least 24 months of follow-up. SDMT values were reported as corrected values (cSDMT) and z-scores (zSDMT). Annualized cSDMT and zSDMT scores were calculated by dividing the change in scores by the length of the follow-up period (expressed in years). Results: Both POMS and AOMS groups showed improvement in annualized cSDMT and zSDMT scores, but the improvement was significantly greater in the POMS group compared to the AOMS group (+3.85 ± 4.32 vs. +1.76 ± 2.80, Conclusion: The favorable clinical, radiological, and neuropsychological outcomes observed in this study support the use of natalizumab as a viable treatment option in POMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.