Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39574507›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

The vestibular implant: effects of stimulation parameters on the electrically-evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Stan C J van Boxel, Bernd L Vermorken, Benjamin Volpe, Nils Guinand, Angélica Perez-Fornos, Elke M J Devocht, Raymond van de Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the role of the electrically evoked Vestibulo-Ocular reflex in vestibular implant surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stan C J van BoxelDivision of Vestibular Disorders, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Bernd L VermorkenDivision of Vestibular Disorders, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Benjamin VolpeDivision of Vestibular Disorders, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Nils GuinandService of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Angélica Perez-FornosService of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elke M J DevochtDivision of Vestibular Disorders, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Raymond van de BergDivision of Vestibular Disorders, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The vestibular implant is a neuroprosthesis which offers a potential treatment approach for patients suffering from vestibulopathy. Investigating the influence of electrical stimulation parameters is essential to improve the vestibular implant response. Optimization of the response focuses on the electrically evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex. It aims to facilitate high peak eye velocities and adequate alignment of the eye movement responses. In this study, the basic stimulation parameters of the vestibular implant were tested for their effect on the electrically evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex. Methods: Four stimulation parameters, including the stimulation amplitude, phase duration, stimulus rate and speed of change of stimulation, were systematically tested in a cohort of nine subjects with a vestibulo-cochlear implant. These parameters were tested to evaluate their effect on fitting settings (i.e., threshold of activation, upper comfortable limit and dynamic range) as well as on the electrically evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex (peak eye velocity and alignment). Results: It was confirmed that, in addition to current amplitude, the peak eye velocity of the response can be increased by increasing the phase duration and pulse rate. Both parameters have little effect on the alignment of the eye response. However, a longer phase duration decreased the range between the threshold of activation and the upper comfortable limit of the electrical stimulation (i.e., dynamic range). Furthermore, these results show that next to the amplitude of the stimulation, the speed of change in stimulation has a determinative positive effect on the peak eye velocity. Conclusion: The observations in this study imply that the vestibular implant response, in terms of peak eye velocity, can be optimized with a higher pulse rate and longer phase duration. However, this comes at a trade-off between the dynamic range and power consumption. This study provides essential insights for fitting strategies in future vestibular implant care.

Indexed as

electrically evoked vestibulo-ocular reflexphase durationpulse ratestimulation amplitudevestibular implantvestibular stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39574507
PMCPMC11579865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.