ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Determining Ideal Nasal Tip Projection in Diverse Populations.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nasal tip projection ideals have been based on the Caucasian nose; however, many racial groups have underprojected tips. Several methodologies have been described to measure ideal nasal tip projection. This study aimed to compare various methods to racially diverse groups to elucidate those best suited for race-specific facial morphology. Methods: An openly accessible artificial intelligence image generator was used to generate images of Caucasian, Middle Eastern, and African American noses. Tip projection was manually measured using 5 different ideal tip projection methods. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey honest significant difference test evaluated differences between racial cohorts. One-sample Results: Twenty lateral images were analyzed per racial cohort (10 men and 10 women). All racial groups-except for male Middle Eastern noses ( Conclusions: This study suggests that the ideal nasal length to tip length ratio of two-thirds (67%) has generalizability across these racial groups; the lip tangent is an excellent method for evaluating tip projection in Caucasians; and assessment of ideal tip projection in Middle Eastern and African American groups should use regional midface and lower face anatomy to account for differences in facial morphology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.