ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Effect of foot strike patterns and angles on the biomechanics of side-step cutting.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foot and Ankle Contributions to Noncontact ACL Injury Risk: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Direction-led temporal control and expertise-based load redistribution in 45° cutting: an SPM-based analysis of ankle mechanics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Comparison of lower limb muscle activation between slow and fast tempos during the stepping test in young men.PloS one · 2025Article
- Lower-limb asymmetries in jump athletes during single-leg drop jump.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to determine how foot strike patterns and cutting angles affect lower extremity (LE) kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity during side-step cutting. Methods: Twenty male college sport athletes participated in this research. Three-dimensional motion analysis featuring ground reaction force (GRF) and electromyography (EMG) of the dominant leg was used. LE kinematics, kinetics, and EMG data parameters were obtained during a 45° and 90° side-step cutting involving rearfoot strikes (RFS) and forefoot strikes (FFS). Results: The significant foot strike pattern × angle interactions were observed for the ankle eversion range of motion (ROM) at the loading phase. Cutting of 90° had greater knee flexion ROM, knee valgus ROM, and knee varus moment compared to that of 45°. RFS cutting had greater knee flexion, hip flexion, knee valgus, knee varus moment, knee varus moment, and ankle eversion ROM. FFS cutting produced a lower vertical GRF, lateral GRF, and a loading rate. Both vastus medialis and vastus lateralis muscle activities were remarkably greater during cutting of 90° than 45°. At the loading phase, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, and the lateral head of gastrocnemius muscle activities during FFS cutting were considerably greater than those during RFS cutting. Conclusion: The FFS pattern can better protect the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and improve the flexibility of athletes by increasing the plantarflexion torque of the ankle. The injury risk also increases with the larger cutting angle. The EMG activities of semitendinosus and biceps femoris are vital for the stability of knee joint during side-step cutting, which helps reduce ACL stress during buffering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.