Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39574391›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2024

Agile, on-demand wastewater surveillance of virus infections to support pandemic and outbreak response in Rotterdam-Rijnmond, the Netherlands, 2020 to 2022.

Emma Besijn, Jane Whelan, Paul Bijkerk, Gregorius J Sips, Jeroen Langeveld, Ray W Izquierdo-Lara, Elvira van Baarle, Remy Schilperoort, Marion P G Koopmans, Miranda de Graaf and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emma BesijnPublic Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jane WhelanPublic Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul BijkerkPublic Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gregorius J SipsPublic Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen LangeveldPartners for Urban Water, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ray W Izquierdo-LaraDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Elvira van BaarlePublic Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Remy SchilperoortPartners for Urban Water, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marion P G KoopmansDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Miranda de GraafDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gertjan MedemaSanitary Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Ewout FanoyPublic Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundWastewater surveillance may support early and comprehensive detection of infectious diseases' community transmission, particularly in settings where other health surveillance systems provide biased or limited information. Amid the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, deploying passive samplers to monitor targeted populations gained importance. Evaluation of the added public health value of this approach in the field can support its broader adoption.AimWe aimed to assess the feasibility and utility of on-demand wastewater surveillance, employing passive samplers, for SARS-CoV-2 and monkeypox virus (MPXV) in small/targeted populations, also considering ethical aspects.MethodsPilot case studies in the Rotterdam-Rijnmond region were used for a systematic assessment of the feasibility and utility of wastewater monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 (variants) and MPXV using passive sampling. Each case study was instigated by actual questions from the Public Health Service about disease transmission.ResultsCase study results demonstrated the feasibility and utility of on-demand wastewater surveillance with successful identification of a local peak in SARS-CoV-2 transmission, early detection of wider Omicron variant transmission after the first case was reported, as well as indication of no emerging local MPXV transmission. Ethical considerations led to the abandonment of one case study involving a displaced population.ConclusionsThe study confirms the feasibility and utility of passive sampling for real-time infectious disease surveillance, at desired spatiotemporal resolution. Ethical concerns and operational challenges were identified, highlighting the need for early stakeholder engagement and ethical guideline adherence. The method could be used to study under-surveyed populations and be extended beyond SARS-CoV-2 and MPXV to other pathogens.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksMonkeypox virusSARS-CoV-2WastewaterCOVID-19HumansMpox, MonkeypoxNetherlandsPandemicsWastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringWastewaterCitiesDisease outbreaksMpox viruspassive samplersSARS-CoV-2StudentsWastewater

Identifiers

PMID39574391
PMCPMC11583307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.