ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024
Prognostic efficacy of lymph node parameters in resected ampullary adenocarcinoma based on long-term follow-up data after adjuvant treatment.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLymph node (LN) metastasis is an important prognostic factor in the ampulla of Vater (AoV) adenocarcinoma. Various LN parameters have been proposed, but their prognostic efficacy has not been compared in the same population. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic values of LN parameters in AoV adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgical resection and adjuvant treatment based on the long-term follow-up data.
methodsA total of 86 patients with surgically resected AoV adenocarcinoma followed by adjuvant treatment were analyzed. We evaluated the prognostic values of various LN parameters such as pathologic N stage, number of metastatic regional LN (LNN), LN ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive LNs (LODDS). Each LN parameter was separately analyzed using Cox regression models with the same confounders.
resultsThe median follow-up period was 69.4 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 114 months. The median number of dissected LNs is 15, with an interquartile range of 8 to 25. In the univariable analyses, all LN parameters showed significant prognostic efficacy for OS, disease-free survival (DFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). In the multivariable Cox regression analyses, LNN ≥ 2 was a statistically significant prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-3.97; p = 0.022), DFS (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.28-4.93; p = 0.007), and DMFS (HR 2.74, 95% CI 1.39-5.41; p = 0.004). LNR showed significant prognostic performance for DFS (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.23-4.50; p = 0.010), and DMFS (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.17-4.35; p = 0.015). N stage showed significant prognostic performance in DFS (HR 1.55 for pN1; p = 0.243 and HR 4.31 for pN2; p = 0.003), DMFS (HR 1.46 for pN1; p = 0.323 and 4.59 for pN2; p = 0.002). LODDS and the presence of LN metastasis, did not demonstrate significant prognostic value across survival outcomes.
conclusionsLN parameters showed good long-term predictive performance in AoV adenocarcinoma patients treated with curative resection and adjuvant treatments. Among LN parameters, LNN ≥ 2 showed better prognostic value than others. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate the clinical usefulness of various LN parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.