Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39574144›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Subgroup differences in public attitudes, preferences and self-reported behaviour related to deceased organ donation before and after the introduction of the 'soft' opt-out consent system in England: mixed-methods study.

Paul Boadu, Leah McLaughlin, Jane Noyes, Stephen O'Neill, Mustafa Al-Haboubi, Lorraine Williams, Jennifer Bostock, Nicholas Mays

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Willing to Donate? A Quantitative and Thematic Analysis of Attitudes to Deceased Organ Donation in Different Circumstances.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Qualitative Content and Discourse Analysis Comparing the Current Consent Systems for Deceased Organ Donation in Spain and England.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul BoaduPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Paul.Boadu@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9712-4760
Leah McLaughlinSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0185-6639
Jane NoyesSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4238-5984
Stephen O'NeillPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-0500
Mustafa Al-HaboubiPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-2206
Lorraine WilliamsPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4188-3949
Jennifer BostockPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9261-9350
Nicholas MaysPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9808-8466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the UK, over 7,000 people are on the waiting list for an organ transplant and there are inequalities in need, access and waiting time for organs, with notable differences between minority ethnic groups. In May 2020, England changed the law and introduced a 'soft' opt-out system of consent to organ donation with a view to increase consent rates. We aimed to learn more about the impact of the law change on attitudes and views likely to be relevant to consent to deceased organ donation between different population subgroups.

methodsMixed-methods design involving latent class analysis of data from twelve repeated cross-sectional surveys undertaken from 2015 to 2021 (n = 19,011); analysis of the law change survey dataset collected quarterly from 2018 to 2022 (n = 45,439); and interviews with purposively selected members of the public (n = 30) with a focus on minority perspectives.

resultsSupport for the principle of deceased organ donation remained high and stable in the general population (80%) but was 20% lower among ethnic minorities. From 2018 to 2022, an average of 58% of the general population was aware of the law change; this was lower among minority ethnic groups (31%). We identified four population subgroups (supportive donors (24% of the population); unengaged donors (22%); uncommitted donors (46%); and unsupportive donors (9%)). Interview themes included the challenges of discussing organ donation decisions, balancing autonomy with respecting family relationships, targeted misinformation, frustrations at the lack of consensus between community leaders, limited understanding of what happens during the end-of-life care leading to organ donation, and how this aligns with cultural values and preferences.

conclusionImplementation of the law change has not been associated to date with any change in public attitudes and preferences likely to influence consent overall or in minority ethnic groups in England. Uncommitted donors may benefit from encouragement to express their organ donation decision, and unengaged donors from attempts to address mis/information, confusion, and uncertainty. Interventions to raise the consent rate need to take account of the significant role of the family as well as wider community influences on attitudes, preferences and decision-making, particularly among certain minority (ethnic) groups.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic OpinionSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDeemed consentInequalitiesLatent class analysisMixed-methodsOrgan donationPatient and public involvement and engagementPublic attitudes and behaviours

Identifiers

PMID39574144
PMCPMC11580530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.