Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39574115›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2024

Genomic profiling and expanded use of targeted anticancer drugs in solid cancers with exhausted evidence-based treatment options (PRECODE): study protocol of a prospective, non-randomized, cohort study.

Karin Holmskov Hansen, Maria Bibi Lyng, Annette Raskov Kodahl, Jon Thor Asmussen, Arman Arshad, Henrik Petersen, Lotte Krogh, Sidse Ehmsen, Thomas Kielsgaard Kristensen, Henrik J Ditzel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05385081 (PREcision Medicine in Cancer in Odense, Denmark), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05385081 naunknown statusnot on this map

PREcision Medicine in Cancer in Odense, Denmark (PRECODE) Feasibility of Genomic Profiling and Frequency of Genomic Matched Treatment in Solid Tumors With no Treatment Options

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled900ConditionsMetastatic Solid TumorArmsgenomic profiling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karin Holmskov HansenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. holmskov-hansen@hotmail.com.
Maria Bibi LyngDepartment of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Annette Raskov KodahlDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jon Thor AsmussenDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Arman ArshadDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Henrik PetersenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lotte KroghDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sidse EhmsenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Thomas Kielsgaard KristensenDepartment of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Henrik J DitzelDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic profiling of advanced solid cancer in patients with no further evidence based standard treatment options is a novel approach to identify potential experimental treatment options based on specific genomic alterations. Due to the expected short survival of these patients timely assessment of potential druggable targets is critical to minimize the risk of deterioration during the analysis. The primary objective of this prospective study is to evaluate the turnaround time for genomic profiling and the clinical investigational procedures. The secondary objectives are to investigate how often genomic alterations in tumor tissue gives rise to a matched treatment offer and evaluate the clinical outcome.

methodsThe PRECODE study is a prospective, non-randomized, single-center cohort study conducted at Departments of Oncology and Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Enrollment between March 1, 2019 and December 31, 2024. Eligibility criteria are age ≥ 18 years, written informed consent, advanced solid tumors, exhausted treatment options, ECOG performance status 0-2, adequate organ function and life expectancy ≥ 3 months. A core needle biopsy is analyzed by next generation sequencing using a pan-cancer comprehensive panel. Results are discussed weekly at institutional/local and national multidisciplinary tumor boards. DISCUSSION: Strategies and methods for genomic profiling of advanced solid cancers differ. Rapid analysis and interpretation of sequencing data are key to avoiding delays in initiation potential experimental treatments, as these late-stage patients may quickly deteriorate. Although a highly optimized setup with fast-track clinical evaluation and genomic profiling has been established a subset will not be offered a targeted treatment due to deterioration. Local and national multidisciplinary teams have been established to optimize individualized treatment decisions. After genomic profiling a subset of patients will take part in clinical trials, which will constrain the reporting of overall survival or progression free survival.

trial registrationDanish Ethics Committee, Projekt-ID: S-2018014, date of approval: 27- FEB- 2019) Danish Data Protection Agency (Journal no: 18/58329, date of approval: 23-NOV-2018). CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT05385081 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsGenomicsNeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyProspective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsGenomic profilingNext generation sequencingSolid cancersTumor agnostic therapy

Identifiers

PMID39574115
PMCPMC11583735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.