Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39574107›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Effect of different boron contents within boron-doped hydroxyapatite-chitosan nano-composite on the microhardness of demineralized enamel.

Bahare Asgartooran, Amirhossein Bahadori, Zahra Khamverdi, Erfan Ayubi, Abbas Farmany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bahare AsgartooranDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Amirhossein BahadoriDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. amirbahadori99@gmail.com.
Zahra KhamverdiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Erfan AyubiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Abbas FarmanyDental Implant Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. a.farmany@ut.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDental caries is a prevalent chronic disease globally, arising from an imbalance between tooth remineralization and demineralization. Early detection of lesions is crucial, with non-invasive methods preferred in the initial stages of caries for enamel remineralization and demineralization prevention. This study aimed to assess the impact of varying contents of boron-doped hydroxyapatite-chitosan nano-composite on the microhardness of demineralized enamel. MATERIALS AND

methodsBoron-doped hydroxyapatite-chitosan nano-composites at concentrations of 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% were prepared using the sol-gel method. Thirty intact human premolars were collected to evaluate tooth remineralization. The teeth were divided into buccal and lingual halves, subjected to pH cycling for 14 days to demineralize the enamel surface. Subsequently, the specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 15) based on the application of remineralizing materials: Group 1 - Hydroxyapatite-chitosan nano-composite (HApC); Group 2 - Boron-doped hydroxyapatite-chitosan nano-composite (B@HApC) with 5% boron concentration; Group 3 - Boron-doped hydroxyapatite-chitosan nano-composite (B@HApC) with 10% boron concentration; and Group 4 - Boron-doped hydroxyapatite-chitosan nano-composite (B@HApC) with 15% boron concentration. Microhardness was measured at three points using a Vickers hardness test (300 g force for 10 s).

resultsThe study revealed a significant difference between the nano-composite groups containing 5%, 10%, and 15% boron compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The highest microhardness was observed in the 15% boron group (49.42), with the control group showing the lowest microhardness (20.15). Pairwise comparisons of microhardness indicated a significant difference between Group 4 and the control group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between Groups 2 and 3, Groups 2 and 4, and Groups 3 and 4 (p > 0.05). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) results supported the microhardness findings, showing a mineral layer covering the porous structure resulting from enamel surface demineralization in the intervention groups, highlighting the effectiveness of boron in enhancing the microhardness of demineralized enamel.

conclusionThe study demonstrated that a content of 15% boron in B@HApC and higher led to increased microhardness of demineralized enamel. Additionally, content of 5% and 10% boron in the nano-composite also improved microhardness, although not to a statistically significant extent.

Indexed as

BoronChitosanDental EnamelDurapatiteHardnessNanocompositesTooth DemineralizationHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSurface PropertiesTooth RemineralizationBoronChitosanDurapatiteBoronChitosanDemineralizationEnamelHydroxyapatiteNano-compositeRemineralization

Identifiers

PMID39574107
PMCPMC11580543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.