ArticleBMC cancer2024
A machine learning model revealed that exosome small RNAs may participate in the development of breast cancer through the chemokine signaling pathway.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Exploration of Solid Cancer Biomarkers Hidden Within Urine or Blood Exosomes That Provide Fundamental Information for Future Cancer Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExosome small RNAs are believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of cancer, but their role in breast cancer is still unclear. This study utilized machine learning models to screen for key exosome small RNAs and analyzed and validated them.
methodPeripheral blood samples from breast cancer screening positive and negative people were used for small RNA sequencing of plasma exosomes. The differences in the expression of small RNAs between the two groups were compared. We used machine learning algorithms to analyze small RNAs with significant differences between the two groups, fit the model through training sets, and optimize the model through testing sets. We recruited new research subjects as validation samples and used PCR-based quantitative detection to validate the key small RNAs screened by the machine learning model. Finally, target gene prediction and functional enrichment analysis were performed on these key RNAs.
resultsThe machine learning model incorporates six small RNAs: piR-36,340, piR-33,161, miR-484, miR-548ah-5p, miR-4282, and miR-6853-3p. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the machine learning model in the training set was 0.985 (95% CI = 0.948-1), while the AUC in the test set was 0.972 (95% CI = 0.882-0.995). RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression levels of these key small RNAs in the validation samples, and the results revealed that their expression levels were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Through target gene prediction and functional enrichment analysis, it was found that the functions of the target genes were enriched mainly in the chemokine signaling pathway.
conclusionThe combination of six plasma exosome small RNAs has good prognostic value for women with positive breast cancer by imaging screening. The chemokine signaling pathway may be involved in the early stage of breast cancer. It is worth further exploring whether small RNAs mediate chemokine signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of breast cancer through the delivery of exosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.