ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Cyclosporine successfully treats steroid-resistant checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis: a case report.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cyclosporine in hematological disorders: mechanisms, clinical practice and emerging advances.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Advances in the mechanisms, imaging characteristics and management strategies for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Fatal early-onset checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in a patient with advanced squamous-cell lung cancer with underlying pulmonary fibrosis: a case report and review of the literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) stands out as a particularly severe adverse event caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors, with a substantial real-world incidence ranging from 13 to 19%. While systemic corticosteroids represent the standard treatment for CIP, therapeutic options become limited in cases where patients do not respond to corticosteroid therapy. Such patients are classified as having steroid-resistant CIP, often associated with a poor prognosis. This case study provides insight into the symptoms, diagnostic process, and treatment approach for steroid-resistant CIP. Notably, successful management is demonstrated through the utilization of cyclosporine, highlighting its potential mechanisms of action in effectively treating steroid-resistant CIP. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the case of a 53-year-old male with stage IV. A non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who experienced elevated fever, cough, and dyspnea subsequent to immunotherapy treatment. Based on his medical history, clinical manifestations, and radiological findings, the patient was diagnosed with CIP. Initial administration of led to improvement, but during the subsequent tapering of corticosteroid therapy, a resurgence of CIP occurred, resulting in respiratory failure. Consequently, we arrived at the diagnosis of steroid-resistant CIP, prompting the implementation of a combination therapy with cyclosporine and corticosteroids to establish stable disease control. Upon systematic reduction of corticosteroid dosage, the patient maintained a favorable response with no recurrence.
conclusionsThis marks the first instance of effectively managing steroid-resistant CIP through the combined use of cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Presently, cases of steroid-resistant CIP remain infrequent, necessitating vigilant and meticulous monitoring within clinical settings. Notably, there exists no distinct guideline specifying a singular agent for rescuing patients unresponsive to corticosteroid therapy. Therefore, cyclosporine emerges as a promising and efficacious treatment alternative for individuals unresponsive to corticosteroid intervention in the context of CIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.