ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024
A computationally efficient algorithm to leverage average information REML for (co)variance component estimation in the genomic era.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Genetic Parameter Estimation and Breeding Value Ranking for Litter Size Traits in Meat Rabbits: REML and Bayesian Inference Under Limited Data Conditions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Random forest imputation and genomic prediction for missing egg production time-series data in yellow-feathered broiler breeders.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Identifying the Genetic Basis of Fetal Loss in Cows and Heifers Through a Genome-Wide Association Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Estimation of (co)variance components for very large datasets and complex single-step genomic models.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethods for estimating variance components (VC) using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) typically require elements from the inverse of the coefficient matrix of the mixed model equations (MME). As genomic information becomes more prevalent, the coefficient matrix of the MME becomes denser, presenting a challenge for analyzing large datasets. Thus, computational algorithms based on iterative solving and Monte Carlo approximation of the inverse of the coefficient matrix become appealing. While the standard average information REML (AI-REML) is known for its rapid convergence, its computational intensity imposes limitations. In particular, the standard AI-REML requires solving the MME for each VC, which can be computationally demanding, especially when dealing with complex models with many VC. To bridge this gap, here we (1) present a computationally efficient and tractable algorithm, named the augmented AI-REML, which facilitates the AI-REML by solving an augmented MME only once within each REML iteration; and (2) implement this approach for VC estimation in a general framework of a multi-trait GBLUP model. VC estimation was investigated based on the number of VC in the model, including a two-trait, three-trait, four-trait, and five-trait GBLUP model. We compared the augmented AI-REML with the standard AI-REML in terms of computing time per REML iteration. Direct and iterative solving methods were used to assess the advances of the augmented AI-REML.
resultsWhen using the direct solving method, the augmented AI-REML and the standard AI-REML required similar computing times for models with a small number of VC (the two- and three-trait GBLUP model), while the augmented AI-REML demonstrated more notable reductions in computing time as the number of VC in the model increased. When using the iterative solving method, the augmented AI-REML demonstrated substantial improvements in computational efficiency compared to the standard AI-REML. The elapsed time of each REML iteration was reduced by 75%, 84%, and 86% for the two-, three-, and four-trait GBLUP models, respectively.
conclusionsThe augmented AI-REML can considerably reduce the computing time within each REML iteration, particularly when using an iterative solver. Our results demonstrate the potential of the augmented AI-REML as an appealing approach for large-scale VC estimation in the genomic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.