ArticleOptics express2024
Measurement precision bounds on aberrated single-molecule emission patterns.
Article in Optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interferometric ultra-high resolution 3D imaging through brain sections.Nature communications · 2026Article
- 4polar3D single molecule imaging of 3D orientation in dense actin networks using ratiometric polarization splitting.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) has revolutionized the study of biological phenomena by providing exquisite nanoscale spatial resolution. However, optical aberrations induced by sample and system imperfections distort the single-molecule emission patterns (i.e. PSFs), leading to reduced precision and resolution of SMLM, particularly in three-dimensional (3D) applications. While various methods, both analytical and instrumental, have been employed to mitigate these aberrations, a comprehensive analysis of how different types of commonly encountered aberrations affect single-molecule experiments and their image formation remains missing. In this study, we addressed this gap by conducting a quantitative study of the theoretical precision limit for position and wavefront distortion measurements in the presence of aberrations. Leveraging Fisher information and Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB), we quantitively analyzed and compared the effects of different aberration types, including index mismatch aberrations, on localization precision in both biplane and astigmatism 3D modalities as well as 2D SMLM imaging. Furthermore, we studied the achievable wavefront estimation precision from aberrated single-molecule emission patterns, a pivot step for successful adaptive optics in SMLM through thick specimens. This analysis lays a quantitative foundation for the development and application of SMLM in whole-cells, tissues and with a large field of view, providing in-depth insights into the behavior of different aberration types in single-molecule imaging and thus generating theoretical guidelines for developing highly efficient aberration correction strategies and enhancing the precision and reliability of 3D SMLM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.