ArticleScientific reports2024
Effects of virus-induced immunogenic cues on oncolytic virotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cracking the shield: oncolytic viruses versus the tumor-immune fortress.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- An inhalable microbe-oncolytic virus consortium for lung cancer treatment.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Mathematical Modeling of the Role of Cytokines in Sindbis Virus Treatment of Glioblastoma.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Alphavirus replicons encoding IFN-γ enhance cancer virotherapy by overcoming macrophage-mediated suppression.iScience · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncolytic virotherapy is a promising form of cancer treatment that uses viruses to infect and kill cancer cells. In addition to their direct effects on cancer cells, the viruses stimulate various immune responses partly directed against the tumour. Efforts are made to genetically engineer oncolytic viruses to enhance their immunogenic potential. However, the interplay between tumour growth, viral infection, and immune responses is complex and not fully understood, leading to variable and sometimes counterintuitive therapeutic outcomes. Here, we employ a spatio-temporal model to shed more light on this interplay. We investigate systematically how the properties of virus-induced immunogenic signals (their half-life, rate of spread, and potential to promote T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity) affect the therapeutic outcome. Our simulations reveal that strong immunogenic signals, combined with faster diffusion rates, improve the spread of immune activation, leading to better tumour eradication. However, replicate simulations suggest that the outcome of virotherapy is more stochastic than generally appreciated. Our model shows that virus-induced immune responses can interfere with virotherapy, by targeting virus-infected cancer cells and/or by impeding viral spread. In the presence of immune responses, the mode of virus introduction is important, with systemic viral delivery throughout the tumour yielding the most favourable outcomes. The timing of virus introduction also plays a critical role; depending on the efficacy of the immune response, a later start of virotherapy can be advantageous. Overall, our results emphasise that the rational design of oncolytic viruses requires optimising virus-induced immunogenic signals and strategies that balance viral spread with immune activity for improved therapeutic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.